In response to a comment from "anonymous" asking why Jason Altmire is giving us nothing, I suggest that "anonymous" take an evening class in basic economics (while they are still offered!)
Voting to reduce your federal taxes by LESS than $200 (forget the $400 unless you're making a lot of money) sounds great until you realize that Altmire had no problem mortgaging your children's future with his blind, lockstep, kiss-ass funding of two illegal wars. Who do you think will pay for that? Your paltry $400 federal tax cut? Get real! That $400 is going to be taken away by other business procurements.
We're paying Halliburton (Still!) huge sums of money to screw our troops. Where does that money come from? US!
If your intellect is so limited that you think you're getting a free and clear "gift" of $400 in tax cuts and don't realize that you'll pay for it in another way, you deserve the heap of bull you're going to get.
Altmire voted against the health care bill because he worked for UPMC and they didn't like it. The Tea bigots are trying to get it reversed because they have less intelligence than the Republicans pushing the repeal. Please tell me how the health care bill is hurting you? Anyone?
Did it take away any insurance you now have? Nope!
Are you paying higher premiums now? Sure! But not because of the health bill. The insurance industry says that they have to raise prices 20 to 39% because the cost of coverage has increased. And the CBO reported that 2 to 3% increases should have been acceptable. The rest is for their pockets. They have posted profits that make Wall Street envious!
Altmire voted against the stimulus even though economist after economist says it worked but needed to be larger.
The lackeys in Altmire's ads say he's independent yet he's voted more with Republicans than any Democrat should. That's not independent. That's screwing the voters of this area into thinking he's a Democrat and for the common people when his ideals show he's only committed to the 3% of the wealthiest in this area.
Altmire's FOR extending the tax cuts for the richest Americans. He believes the Ronnie Raygun bullshit that tax cuts for business create jobs. Sure! But only overseas! Businesses took the extra cash form the tax cuts and invested in 20 cents per hour workers in india, Korea, China. But they still charge Americans as if they were paying $15.00 an hour! Nice gig if you can get it. And with BlueDogs like Altmire, business will continue to screw Americans. There's no proof that any of the Bush Tax Cuts created even a thousand jobs for Americans in America.
Don't believe me? Ask Altmire to show you factual proof they created any jobs. Then ask him why he wants to keep giving then huge tax breaks while voting against better health care, more jobs and better education for Americans.
From FDL
Here are the douchebags who call themselves Democrats and yet, somehow, don’t believe the richest families in American society should pull their own weight, even in an economic culture that favors them heavily.
We have all the proof we need that the Bush tax cuts were bad for America. Keeping them in place for the wealthiest Americans can only prolong the damage they’ve begun to our economic progress in the 21st century.
As you get ‘fired up‘ and ‘in gear‘ for the final lap of Midterm Election Season the next five weeks, give thought to these officeholders on Capitol Hill who seem to think that a core tenet of the Democratic Party — that the most privileged and wealthy among us should contribute their fair share to the war machine and upward wealth redistribution engine that is our current tax system — no longer applies.
Do they deserve your support?
They don’t subscribe to the belief that the wealthiest families in America need to pull their own weight.
Do they fire you up?
These people aren’t real Democrats, in my way of thinking. They have swallowed the worst of trickle-up voodoo economics. They subscribe to the AynRandian view that “‘producers’ shouldn’t be penalized to reward parasites.”
Do they get you in gear?
The Democratic Party will never survive as long as there are leaders in it who believe GOP gospel. These people need to change their minds about extending the Bush tax cuts for the richest Americans, or they need to change their work address: House:
Bobby Bright (Ala.)
Artur Davis (Ala.)
Mike Ross (Ark.)
Ann Kirkpatrick (Ariz.)
Harry Mitchell (Ariz.)
Jim Costa (Calif.)
John Salazar (Colo.)
Jim Himes (Conn.)
Allen Boyd (Fla.)
Ron Klein (Fla.)
John Barrow (Ga.)
Sanford Bishop Jr. (Ga.)
Jim Marshall (Ga.)
Walt Minnick (Idaho)
Melissa Bean (Ill.)
Joe Donnelly (Ind.)
Brad Ellsworth (Ind.)
Frank Kratovil (Md.)
Gary Peters (Mich.)
Travis Childers (Miss.)
Larry Kissell (N.C.)
Mike McIntyre (N.C.)
Earl Pomeroy (N.D.)
Harry Teague (N.M.)
Michael Arcuri (N.Y.)
Mike McMahon (N.Y.)
Zack Space (Ohio)
Dan Boren (Okla.)
Jason Altmire (Pa.)
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (S.D.)
Jim Cooper (Tenn.)
Lincoln Davis (Tenn.)
Jim Matheson (Utah)
Rick Boucher (Va.)
Gerry Connolly (Va.)
Glenn Nye (Va.)
Senate:
Joe Lieberman (Conn.), an independent who caucuses with Democrats
Evan Bayh (Ind.)
Ben Nelson (Neb.)
Kent Conrad (N.D.)
Jim Webb (Va.)
Michael Bennet (Colo.) — “will consider a short-term compromise”
Mary Landrieu (La.) — “open-minded” to it, a one-year extension “probably would be good”
Barbara Boxer (Calif.) — supports extending tax cuts “at least 98 percent [of] Americans,” would review proposals for families above that threshold
I’m not sure why Democrats are letting Republicans tout the Bush tax cuts as though they were so awesome for the country. If the Democrats were doing their job, “Bush tax cuts” would sound like “shit sandwich,” because they objectively weren’t. - Total income was $2.74 trillion less during the eight Bush years than if incomes had stayed at 2000 levels.
- Average incomes fell. Average taxpayer income was down $3,512, or 5.7 percent, in 2008 compared with 2000, President Bush’s own benchmark year for his promises of prosperity through tax cuts.
- Since 2000, population grew more than wages.
- In 2008 nearly 1 in every 200 high-income taxpayers paid no federal income tax, up from about 1 in 1,500 in 1998.
- The tax cuts did not spur investment. Job growth in the George W. Bush years was one-seventh that of the Clinton years. Nixon and Ford did better than Bush on jobs.
- One of every eight dollars of the tax cuts went to the 1 in 1,000 taxpayers in the top tenth of 1 percent, the annual threshold for which was in the $2 million range throughout the last administration.
- The number of Americans in poverty, as officially measured, hit a 16-year high last year of 43.6 million, though a National Academy of Sciences study says that the real poverty figure is closer to 51 million.
So to recap, declining wages, increased poverty, anemic job growth and a boon for the people in the top 1%. Heckuva job!