No No's at it again! (Sigh!)

Does she even know the meaning of the word hypocrite? I bet if you look up hypocrite in the dictionary, you’ll see a picture of her right next to it – if you can stomach the vie-eeew! Speaking of that….


hyp·o·crite
   /ˈhɪpəkrɪt/ Show Spelled[hip-uh-krit] Show IPA
–noun
1. a person who pretends to have virtues, moral or religious beliefs, principles, etc., that he or she does not actually possess, esp. a person whose actions belie stated beliefs.
2. a person who feigns some desirable or publicly approved attitude, esp. one whose private life, opinions, or statements belie his or her public statements.

As the only “NO Vote” (what else does she know how to do?) at last night’s meeting on appealing the idiotic decision made by three blind mice, she claimed,

"I was opposed to it when it happened," Wisner said. "I think it should have happened in public as it involved public funds. I don't think this is worth our time."

To refresh your toilet paper erased memories, Wisner went running like a school girl, crying her age-hardened eyes out to the local piece of shit paper and its ethically questionable representative over the DISCUSSION about engaging Nick Starsenic as an advisor. I’ve been all over this before. Timmy McCute decided to be a BMOC and file a suit against the board for the same reason the tp did.

However, his attorney was evidently much more intelligent than the three blind mice and dropped the case.
That didn’t satisfy Wisner though, she wanted to spend more of your tax dollars at the time to fight, fight, fight! But now, OH MY, we can’t waste any more money. Why does she feel this way? Probably because she and the Scaife puppets know that the appeal will be reversed by the high court. You know, the one that actually looks at the wording of the Law that : “…Commonwealth Judge Patricia A. McCullough wrote that the private meeting with Heights Plaza Shopping Center representatives "has the odor of favoritism that the Sunshine Act does not tolerate." It’s the job of judges to decide on things based on fact not “odor.” I’ve looked everywhere and can’t find any reference to smell in the SunShine Law. Maybe there’s a secret addendum to it that the public doesn’t know about? Oh wait! That wouldn’t smell right! After talking with a few constitutional (Pa.) lawyers, the consensus is that three panel judgeship overstepped its bounds and rendered a decision based, not on fact, but, feeling.

It’s sure to be overturned. There are too many instances where executive meetings were held to discuss private matters that were then made public as the law allows.
No vote was taken in the executive meeting the tp refers to; no decision was made that was binding. The SunShine Act allows for the discussion of such topics in executive session provided the information is not voted on and is made public at the next scheduled public meeting. If you doubt the validity of that, look it up yourself.

And why did all this occur in the first place? Well, it was because poor old Tommy Yerace was refused a seat in the executive session (which can be closed to the public, press, military and even president) and he cried “wheee wheee wheee” all the way back to Jeffy’s desk (and probably hid under it sobbing).
Friends on the inside told me that the Big operators at the tp cried, “They violated the first amendment! Have they no shame?”

Remember, these are the same operators who refused to publish articles against the Better Choice for Highlands rabble at the time (who may have also violated the law with their secret meetings with candidates present).
Jeffy better hope the superior or state supreme court doesn’t reverse the appeal. That would open the door for the School District to sue the tp. And if the district doesn’t do it, there’s a provision in the Pa. Law that allows residents to do just that. And I know a few who are willing to give that a shot.

By the way, Jeffy, quitting, retiring or going on permanent vacation doesn’t absolve you from responsibility if the appeal is reversed and the tp is sued. The tp and you could lose massive amounts of money if it’s carried to its limit. There’s only one thing that can get you out of it. Personally, I’d recommend you take that opportunity.

. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to No No's at it again! (Sigh!)

  1. Ron Misejka Sr. says:

    This is why the main focus should be to relieve Wisner of any connection to the Highlands School District this election year.

Leave a Reply